• 4 - A Junk Science

  • 2024/10/04
  • 再生時間: 17 分
  • ポッドキャスト

  • サマリー

  • Forensically speaking, blood spatter analysis isn’t the most reliable. Delve further into the details with Kylie and Rory this week as they discuss the forensic bind between the legal cases of Warren, Tim, and David. Also hear about one of the (in Kylie’s opinion) worst so-called experts we’ve encountered in our journey so far.

    Content warnings - lots of blood talk, murder
    https://www.transformationsnetwork.com/post/8-online-mental-health-resources-anyone-can-access

    References:
    http://www.wcojp.org/bevel-credibility.html
    https://www.bevelgardner.com/expertshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/31/magazine/bloodstain-pattern-analysis-timeline.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodstain_pattern_analysis
    https://www.propublica.org/article/joe-bryans-attorneys-ask-for-new-trial-say-murder-conviction-built-on-faulty-forensics
    https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/joe-bryan-conviction-blood-spatter-forensic-evidence/
    https://signalscv.com/2021/07/blood-spatter-familial-matters-in-cierzan-murder-trial/
    https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witnesshttps://investigatinginnocenceblog.com/tag/rod-englert/
    https://darliefacts.com/blood-evidence/
    https://seoklaw.com/legal-news/the-innocent-man-the-story-of-ronald-williamson/
    https://innocenceproject.org/cases/dennis-fritz/
    And Justice For None, The life and death of an innocent man. By Mary Ann West.
    https://abcnews4.com/news/local/murdaugh-wants-forensic-analyst-barred-from-testifying-about-blood-spatter-in-murder-trial
    https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/25/us/alex-murdaugh-trial-names/index.html
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Forensically speaking, blood spatter analysis isn’t the most reliable. Delve further into the details with Kylie and Rory this week as they discuss the forensic bind between the legal cases of Warren, Tim, and David. Also hear about one of the (in Kylie’s opinion) worst so-called experts we’ve encountered in our journey so far.

Content warnings - lots of blood talk, murder
https://www.transformationsnetwork.com/post/8-online-mental-health-resources-anyone-can-access

References:
http://www.wcojp.org/bevel-credibility.html
https://www.bevelgardner.com/expertshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/31/magazine/bloodstain-pattern-analysis-timeline.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodstain_pattern_analysis
https://www.propublica.org/article/joe-bryans-attorneys-ask-for-new-trial-say-murder-conviction-built-on-faulty-forensics
https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/joe-bryan-conviction-blood-spatter-forensic-evidence/
https://signalscv.com/2021/07/blood-spatter-familial-matters-in-cierzan-murder-trial/
https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witnesshttps://investigatinginnocenceblog.com/tag/rod-englert/
https://darliefacts.com/blood-evidence/
https://seoklaw.com/legal-news/the-innocent-man-the-story-of-ronald-williamson/
https://innocenceproject.org/cases/dennis-fritz/
And Justice For None, The life and death of an innocent man. By Mary Ann West.
https://abcnews4.com/news/local/murdaugh-wants-forensic-analyst-barred-from-testifying-about-blood-spatter-in-murder-trial
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/25/us/alex-murdaugh-trial-names/index.html

4 - A Junk Scienceに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。