A Brushstroke of Jurisprudence: US Judge Declares AI-Created Art Non-Copyrightable
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
A Brushstroke of Jurisprudence: US Judge Declares AI-Created Art Non-Copyrightable
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
In August 2023, a landmark U.S. court ruling denied copyright protection for AI-generated art, deeming it ineligible due to a lack of human authorship. The decision came in a lawsuit by Stephen Thaler against the U.S. Copyright Office for rejecting his application to copyright an image created by his AI system. While Thaler plans to appeal, experts say the verdict underscores current copyright law requiring human creativity. However, AI-assisted art involving substantial human input may still qualify for protection. As AI becomes integral to the creative process, this ruling hints at the complex legal challenges ahead in distinguishing human versus machine authorship. The case significantly develops the evolving relationship between AI, copyright law, and art.
Blog Post:
https://blog.cprompt.ai/a-brushstroke-of-jurisprudence-us-judge-declares-ai-created-art-non-copyrightable
Our YouTube channel
https://youtube.com/@cpromptai
Follow us on Twitter
Kabir - https://x.com/mjkabir
CPROMPT - https://x.com/cpromptai
Blog
https://blog.cprompt.ai
CPROMPT
https://cprompt.ai