『Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine』のカバーアート

Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine

Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine

著者: Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Critical Care Guys: The Minds Behind Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine. 4 Docs come together to discuss current trends in Emergency Medicine. Check out this podcast to stay up-to-date on the goings ons.© 2021 アート 衛生・健康的な生活
エピソード
  • Palliative Care in the ED
    2025/05/17

    Approximately 75% of patients older than 65 years of age are seen in an ED within 6 months of their death. While palliative care teams are now present in many hospitals in the US, they are often not present 24/7 or in resource-limited settings. As such, there may be an opportunity to improve palliative care in the ED by providing palliative care education to ED team members. In this podcast, we review the recently published PRIM-ER trial, which evaluated the impact of a robust primary palliative care intervention on hospital admission rates in 29 EDs across the US.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • When Should We Start Vasopressin in Septic Shock?
    2025/04/15

    Sepsis results in more than 250,000 deaths each year in the United States. Resuscitation of the septic patient centers on timely recognition, early antibiotic administration, appropriate fluid administration, source control, and vasopressor administration for those with inadequate mean arterial pressures. At present, norepinephrine is the recommended first-line vasopressor for sepsis. Current guidelines then recommend vasopressin as the second-line vasopressor agent, but the optimal timing of its initiation remains unknown. In this podcast, we discuss a recent article on the use of a machine learning tool for vasopressin administration to optimize short- and long-term outcomes in patients with sepsis.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • Is HFNC noninferior to NIV for Acute Respiratory Failure?
    2025/01/24

    Both NIV and HFNC are used to treat patients with acute respiratory failure. Current guidelines recommend NIV for acute respiratory failure caused by COPD and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. However, NIV may be hard for some patients to tolerate. When compared to low-flow oxygen therapy, HFNC has been shown to improve oxygenation, improve alveolar recruitment, and enhance clearance of secretions. HFNC may be easier to use and tolerate than NIV, but there remains uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of HFNC compared to NIV for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In this podcast, we discuss the RENOVATE trial that sought to compare HFNC with NIV on rates of intubation in patients with acute respiratory failure.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    32 分

Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicineに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。