Send us a text

Every technical system harbors its share of quick fixes and band-aids – those temporary solutions we implement with the best intentions of returning to fix properly "someday." But what happens when that day never comes?

Peter Madison and David Sharrock dive deep into what they call "longstanding risks" – the accumulated technical debt that results from prioritizing expediency over completeness. Through a relatable example of a memory-leaking service that gets automatically restarted rather than properly fixed, they unpack the hidden costs of these decisions. The conversation reveals how seemingly minor shortcuts can gradually transform robust systems into fragile, unmaintainable messes.

The hosts share a compelling analogy about a utility company that saved money by skipping tree trimming around power lines for just one year – only to face significantly higher costs from the resulting infrastructure damage. This perfectly illustrates how short-term thinking about technical maintenance creates expensive long-term consequences. They offer practical recommendations including proper documentation of temporary fixes, avoiding team overload, and maintaining good system hygiene.

What makes this episode particularly valuable is the mindset shift it advocates: moving from attempting to prevent all possible failures to building systems that remain resilient when inevitable problems occur. As Sharrock references from safety expert Sidney Decker's work, sometimes the best approach is focusing on what makes your system work well rather than obsessively eliminating every risk. Whether you're managing complex technical systems or leading transformation efforts, these insights will help you balance pragmatic solutions with long-term system health.

Send us a text

In this episode of Definitely Maybe Agile, Peter Maddison and David Sharrock explore the critical question: "How do we know when work is ready to start developing?" They discuss the challenges of translating business requirements into technical implementation, the importance of having the right people in collaborative discussions, and practical approaches to defining "ready" work. Peter shares recent experiences with organizations struggling with this exact problem, while Dave highlights how trust between business and technology teams impacts the handoff process. They explore visual collaboration techniques, the concept of "full kit," and practical ways to determine if work is truly ready to begin.

This week´s takeaways:

1. Revisit and reinforce your work definition process regularly, as changing roles and organizational shifts can erode even the most robust systems over time.
2. Use the "full kit" concept as part of your definition of ready, and be willing to say no to work that doesn't meet these criteria.
3. Work is ready to start when it's the team's top priority, has a clearly defined problem to solve, and the team can confidently estimate it within their typical delivery range.

Send us a text

In this insightful conversation with Suzanne El-Moursi, co-founder and CEO of BrightHive, Peter and Dave explore how organizations are addressing the growing gap between data volume and analytical capacity. Suzanne reveals that while 90% of the world's data was created in just the last two years, only about 3% of enterprise employees are data professionals, creating a massive bottleneck where business teams must wait in line for insights from central data teams.

BrightHive's solution is an "agentic data team in a box" – seven AI agents that work in unison to handle the entire data lifecycle from ingestion to governance to analytics. Unlike typical AI solutions, these agents operate at the metadata layer to ensure quality, compliance, and meaningful insights without replacing human expertise.

The conversation covers compelling use cases across industries – from helping resource-constrained organizations extend their analytical capacity to unifying fragmented data landscapes resulting from mergers and acquisitions. Perhaps most striking is Suzanne's vision for measuring AI's impact through what she calls the "delight KPI" – are employees finding their work more fulfilling when augmented by these tools?

Key Takeaways:

• Data fragmentation persists - Organizations struggle with siloed data across systems, especially after mergers, blocking comprehensive analysis.
• AI augments human intelligence - "A doctor with AI will displace a doctor without AI" - the goal is removing grunt work so humans tackle higher-value analysis.
• Measure the "delight KPI" - Track how AI improves job satisfaction by enabling more data-informed work without technical bottlenecks.
• Cultural shift needs technical solutions AND organizational buy-in to overcome skepticism about AI in the workplace.