-
First Feast Forensics (The Reality Behind The First Thanksgiving Meal)
- 著者: Quiet.Please
- ポッドキャスト
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
サマリー
あらすじ・解説
First Feast Forensics - Episode 1: The Reality Behind the First Thanksgiving Menu Welcome to First Feast Forensics. Today we're peeling back the layers of history to uncover what was actually served at the first Thanksgiving celebration in 1621. Most of what we think we know about this famous feast comes from just two primary sources - a letter by Edward Winslow and a passage in William Bradford's Of Plymouth Plantation. These sparse historical records paint a very different picture from our modern celebrations, and over the next thirty minutes, we'll explore exactly what that three-day feast would have looked like, from the ecological context to the cooking methods used. To understand the first Thanksgiving meal, we need to first understand Plymouth in 1621. The settlement sat in a region previously occupied by the Patuxet people, who had been devastated by disease just a few years before. The landscape was a mix of cleared fields, forest, and coastal areas. This diverse environment provided a wealth of food sources that would have been utilized during the celebration. According to Winslow's firsthand account written in December 1621, four settlers went on a "fowling" mission in preparation for the feast. Let's explore what this actually meant. The term "fowling" refers to hunting wild birds, but the techniques used were far different from modern hunting. The settlers would have used matchlock muskets, which were notoriously unreliable in New England's damp climate. They also employed techniques learned from the Wampanoag, such as net trapping and using calls to lure birds. The waters around Plymouth were rich with waterfowl - ducks, geese, and even now-extinct passenger pigeons would have been abundant. These passenger pigeons, which would later be hunted to extinction by the late 1800s, were described by colonists as so numerous that they would darken the sky for hours when migrating. They were prized for their meat and were likely a significant part of the feast. If turkey was served, it would have been wild, not domesticated, and significantly different from our modern birds. Wild turkeys of the period were smaller, leaner, and more agile than their domestic counterparts. They were also more challenging to hunt, requiring knowledge of their habits and habitat. The Wampanoag had developed sophisticated hunting techniques for these birds, including the use of calls and decoys made from preserved turkey parts. The documented centerpiece of this historic meal was venison. Winslow records that the Wampanoag, led by Massasoit, arrived with five deer as their contribution to the feast. This wasn't just food - it was a profound diplomatic gesture. In both English and Wampanoag cultures, the sharing of venison carried deep significance. In English tradition, venison was often reserved for the nobility, while in Wampanoag culture, the sharing of deer meat represented respect and alliance. The hunting of these deer would have employed techniques refined over thousands of years. The Wampanoag used sophisticated driving techniques, where groups of hunters would coordinate to guide deer toward waiting hunters. They also used specialized weapons including bows and arrows with stone points specifically designed for large game. Archaeological evidence from the period shows these points were crafted with remarkable precision. The coastal location of Plymouth meant seafood played a crucial role in the celebration, though this part of the story is often overlooked in modern retellings. The colonists and Wampanoag regularly harvested shellfish from the nearby waters. Archaeological evidence from colonial middens (trash heaps) shows abundant shells from soft-shell clams, mussels, and oysters. These shellfish were not just gathered haphazardly - both cultures had developed sophisticated understanding of tidal patterns and seasonal availability. The collection of shellfish was often the work of women and children in both cultures. They used specialized tools including rakes and baskets designed specifically for this purpose. The timing of collection was crucial - both cultures understood the relationship between moon phases, tides, and shellfish safety. They also knew which areas produced the best specimens and how to ensure sustainable harvesting. Lobsters, which we now consider a luxury, were incredibly abundant. Historical records suggest they would wash up on shore in piles up to two feet high during storms. They were so plentiful that they were sometimes used as fish bait or fertilizer. The method of preparing lobster was different too - they were often dried and smoked rather than boiled fresh. Fish like cod and bass were dietary staples, caught using both English and Native American methods. The Wampanoag had developed sophisticated fish weirs - permanent underwater traps made from wooden stakes and woven reeds. These structures would trap fish during tidal changes while allowing smaller fish to escape, ensuring ...
copyright 2024 Quietr.Please
エピソード
-
19 分
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
20 分
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
15 分
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました