エピソード

  • Understanding Patent Cease and Desist Letters
    2024/09/09
    Understanding Patent Cease and Desist Letters Patents apply to actual inventions and prevent others from manufacturing, selling, or using a product or process. These protections are granted by the government in exchange for public disclosure of the invention, which can leave creators open to instances of patent infringement. When this occurs, an inventor’s first line of defense is the patent cease and desist letter. This formal demand is sent directly to an alleged infringer and can later be used during litigation to show misconduct was knowing and willful. If you have received a cease-and-desist letter based upon patent infringement, please contact us at Verna Law, P.C. at 914-908-6757 or send an e-mail to anthony@vernalaw.com What is a Patent Cease and Desist Letter? Once a patent application has been granted, the owner of the patent has exclusive rights over the invention. When these rights are violated, a patent cease and desist letter can be sent to an alleged infringer of these rights. This is typically the first step in defending a patent, and in most cases, it’s also the last necessary step. Cease and desist notices are partially credited with keeping over 97 percent of legal disputes from ever entering the system. Although patent owners are granted certain protections by the U.S. Government, the onus of policing violations still falls upon the patent owner. Any enforcement activities must begin with the IP owner, and in many cases, this can lead directly to litigation. The driving focus behind patent cease and desist letters is to avoid further legal issues, but without professional assistance, these notices may simply be ignored. Every cease and desist letter explains the misconduct that’s occurring and demands that it be ended. By sending one, patent owners create an evidentiary trail that can later be used in court. If you receive a patent cease and desist letter, you have a specified time period to respond. If infringement is obviously taking place, it’s important to cease those actions immediately. Of course, not every claim of patent infringement is cut and dry, so if there’s any confusion as to whether infringement is occurring, it’s important to consult with a patent law firm to understand the patent owner's demands and the patent owner's patent claims. What Constitutes Patent Infringement? Patent infringement occurs when someone other than the intellectual property owner sells, offers to sell, uses, or manufactures a patented item or process. This must occur during the duration of protection – typically 20 years – and meet all elements of at least one claim within the patent. Some typical defenses to a patent infringement claim include: Prior Art: Alleged infringers may claim that a patent is invalid due to the existence of prior art. Non-Infringement: If the device at issue does not utilize all elements of a claim, infringement has not taken place. Inequitable Conduct: A patent can be invalidated if the owner acted in bad faith during prosecution. Doctrine of Laches: If a patent owner procrastinates in defending its rights, they could lose the ability to do so. Estoppel: Individuals are prevented from making assertions contrary to prior claims, actions, or established facts. Writing a Patent Cease and Desist Letter Considering the increasing number of design and utility patents granted by the USPTO, there’s little doubt that the frequency of patent cease and desist letters is increasing. It’s important to include pertinent patent law when sending a cease and desist letter. This lets the recipient know that you’re doing more than just “fishing” for potential infringing behavior. In addition to including specific instances where your patent was infringed, you need to explain how the recipient’s behavior constitutes infringement. This is done through a patent’s claims. Whenever you file a patent application, you’re required to list several claims that describe the invention.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Provisional vs. Non-Provisional Patent
    1分未満
  • Patent Application Law Firm
    1分未満
  • How to Patent an Idea
    1分未満
  • Food Patents
    2023/11/23
    1分未満
  • Video Blog: Super Bowl Time! Here are some trademark facts from a lawyer who has fought the NFL several times in court over trademark matters.
    2023/02/10
    It's a fun Super Bowl weekend! So this video blog talks about trademarks for the Super Bowl, the NFL, and teams. Enjoy!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Video Blog: Thoughts on the OkGo-Post Trademark Infrignement Lawsuit
    2023/02/01
    Let's talk a little bit about the Post cereal lawsuit against OkGo. I think there's been a lot of confusion about that. So I figured even though I'm on the road, let's chat post filed a lawsuit against the band. Okay go. Why Post wants to file a trademark called OkGo for a line of cereals. Probably ready to made cereals is my guess. The band sent the post a what we call a cease and desist letter. Now, we've heard a lot about cease and desist letters, but we haven't really heard a lot about what happens after you send a cease and desist letter. One of the pitfalls of sending a cease and desist letter is that the potential defendant in a lawsuit who receives that cease and desist letter may have the ability to go to federal court, especially in trademark law, because everything is federal. We want the court to say "We are not infringing upon this trademark." Now, in that particular case, what has to happen then is that the now defendant who asserted the trademark claims, who would have been a plaintiff, also has to file a counter lawsuit for the trademark infringement, as well as answering the the complaint that's there. So really what's happened here is that post started using the phrase, okay, go on cereal. Okay, go. The band did not like that particular use of the phrase. Okay, go. Despite the different sets of goods and services, that lawyer said the cease and desist letter. And in response to the cease and desist letter post decided to take that issue to their home district court and they filed a what we call a declaratory judgment asking the District of Minnesota that they are not infringing. So that's one of the that's one of the things that happens when you send a cease and desist letter. It can backfire on you. And you might actually wind up being a defendant in a lawsuit where, you know, they're being asked to say that they're not actually infringing. You have to make sure that you write your cease and desist letters calmly. You must make sure that you need to write your cease and desist letters specifically, and you need to make sure that you're not really going to kick up dust. But that is certainly one of the things that can happen. And in this particular case, that is exactly what happened that a lawsuit just started. So we have a lot to to to determine, especially a lot to determine about. Okay. Go's use of the trademark. Okay. Go ahead. And if it's a trademark that is famous enough that all other uses should be banned. To me, that's going to be the one and only question on the trademark case.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1分未満
  • Law and Business Podcast Episode 62: Heather and Anthony Talk about Domain Names
    2022/09/13
    The "Law & Business" podcast has returned. Once again, we are with Heather Abissi, our co-host, from Abissi Law. We discuss domain names: How domain names are property;How domain names relate to trademark law;In which ways a person or business can challenge the validity of a domain name registration;Arbitration or Federal Court?What happens when the federal government seizes your domain name? It's a fun conversation! Don't forget to subscribe and rate us 5 stars!
    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分