"The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information."

These words, written in 1944 by Henry A. Wallace, Vice President under Franklin D. Roosevelt, resonate as deeply today as they did during the height of World War II. Wallace’s essay, The Danger of American Fascism, originally published in The New York Times, is a stark warning about the insidious threats to democracy from within.

Henry Wallace’s essay, written nearly 80 years ago, serves as a guidepost in uncertain times. As Wallace himself said:

"If we put our trust in the common sense of common men and 'with malice toward none and charity for all' go forward on the great adventure of making political, economic, and social democracy a practical reality, we shall not fail."

So, I’ll leave you with this question: What are we doing today to ensure democracy remains a practical reality?

And how can we resist the insidious influence of those who would sacrifice truth and justice for money and power?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hello and welcome to Mike Reads Wikipedia. I’m Mike Dicks, your host. Traditionally, on this podcast, I read a random Wikipedia page—hence “Mike Reads Wikipedia”—but recently, I’ve been experimenting with feeding Wikipedia articles into ChatGPT, transforming them into scripts, and then adding my own touches before reading them out. As much as I like the idea of a podcast titled “Mike Gets ChatGPT to Read Wikipedia, Mangle it into a Script that I Edit and Read to You” it might be a bit of a mouthful so, I’m considering renaming it something snappier like “Mike Reads Something Out Loud” or just “Mike Reads Something.” We’ll see how that pans out.

Today’s episode dives into The Life in the UK Test—a test that anyone wishing to settle in the UK and become a citizen must pass. It’s designed to assess knowledge of British history, culture, and institutions through a series of multiple-choice questions.

So, I’m going to throw out a few questions to test your knowledge. Feel free to pause between each question but don’t look up the answers. If you can't answer at least 4 out of 5 correctly without Googling, I might just have to ask you to leave the UK:

Question One: When was the Statute of Rith Luhn enacted?

Question Two: What was the Heptarchy in early English history?

Question Three: Who appoints the Archbishop of Canterbury?

Question Four: How many people were counted in the UK's first census in 1801?

And Question Five: What did Richard Arkwright invent in 1769?

How would you fare with these? I’ll give you the answers at the end of this podcast, so stay tuned to find out if your UK residency is in jeopardy—don't worry, I can’t really deport you!

Last week, a friend of mine took the Life in the UK Test and she failed. Now, she must retake it every seven days, paying £50 each time, until she passes. If she fails to do so, she risks not being allowed to live and work here in the UK. This process made me think about the test and the questions it asks. As a middle-aged British man, I found many of the questions quite challenging without referring to Wikipedia.

I’ve been helping my friend revise, and the more I investigate, the more I question the purpose and practicality of this test. Why does it focus so heavily on obscure history and trivia? Is it genuinely useful for those trying to integrate into British life, or is it merely a bureaucratic hurdle to please politicians who enjoy creating barriers for those wanting to join British society?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.