• Sub-classification within reserved categories: Judgement explainer

  • 2024/08/20
  • 再生時間： 8 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Sub-classification within reserved categories: Judgement explainer

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • On 1 August 2024, a seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the validity of sub-classification within the SC/ST groups in a 6:1 majority. The Majority also noted that the Scheduled Castes notified under the Presidential List of 1950 were not a homogeneous group as they faced varying degrees of discrimination. This decision overrules the five-judge bench decision of the Court in E.V. Chinnaiah v State of A.P. (2004). As many as six opinions were written in this 565-page judgement. In this video, we break down the key findings and observations of the Court.

    続きを読む 一部表示
activate_samplebutton_t1

あらすじ・解説

On 1 August 2024, a seven-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court upheld the validity of sub-classification within the SC/ST groups in a 6:1 majority. The Majority also noted that the Scheduled Castes notified under the Presidential List of 1950 were not a homogeneous group as they faced varying degrees of discrimination. This decision overrules the five-judge bench decision of the Court in E.V. Chinnaiah v State of A.P. (2004). As many as six opinions were written in this 565-page judgement. In this video, we break down the key findings and observations of the Court.

政治・政府
続きを読む 一部表示

Sub-classification within reserved categories: Judgement explainerに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。