The Naturocrit Podcast - Episode 015a3 [s02e05a3]
2019/12/05
再生時間： 1 時間 25 分
ポッドキャスト

カートのアイテムが多すぎます

ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。

カートに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました

ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました

The Naturocrit Podcast - Episode 015a3 [s02e05a3]

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

サマリー
In this multi-part Naturocrit Podcast Episode 015, aka s02e05, titled “The JACM 2019 Special Issue on Naturopathy”, aka SIN, I’ll be primarily looking at a collection -- as published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine and sponsored by the University of Technology Sydney, Australia -- of around 15 articles specifically about naturopathy from contributors largely located in Australia and North America.

--- In this final third of Episode 015 Part 1, I continue a traipse concerning 'fake integration' versus 'true integration' particularly as relates to hacking and ignoring evidence as seen through naturopathy’s knowledge-type coining, fake labeling, camouflaging, and recalcitrance. Here, an Australian ND's [surprising] advice to embrace critical thinking, an example American naturopathy oncology IM practice and its denials of quackery while endorsing homeopathy and kind, and then criticisms from Steven Salzberg at forbes.com and Britt Marie Hermes at seti.org.

続きを読む一部表示

あらすじ・解説

In this multi-part Naturocrit Podcast Episode 015, aka s02e05, titled “The JACM 2019 Special Issue on Naturopathy”, aka SIN, I’ll be primarily looking at a collection -- as published in the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine and sponsored by the University of Technology Sydney, Australia -- of around 15 articles specifically about naturopathy from contributors largely located in Australia and North America.

--- In this final third of Episode 015 Part 1, I continue a traipse concerning 'fake integration' versus 'true integration' particularly as relates to hacking and ignoring evidence as seen through naturopathy’s knowledge-type coining, fake labeling, camouflaging, and recalcitrance. Here, an Australian ND's [surprising] advice to embrace critical thinking, an example American naturopathy oncology IM practice and its denials of quackery while endorsing homeopathy and kind, and then criticisms from Steven Salzberg at forbes.com and Britt Marie Hermes at seti.org.

続きを読む一部表示