In this episode of the School of Law Podcast from the University of Aberdeen, hosts Neil Weightman and Lauren Mitchell explore the complex relationship between mental health and the law with guests Professor Greg Gordon and Dr. Ewan West. The discussion examines why mental harm is more difficult to claim compensation for than physical injury, the evolution of legal approaches to psychiatric injury, and the challenges courts face when balancing competing interests in mental health cases. The experts explain the legal system's historically conservative approach to mental health claims and discuss the need for potential reforms. The episode also features a tour of the University Student Union with University Ambassador Kirsten Kos, showcasing the facilities available to students, including study spaces, affordable dining options, and recreational areas.

In this episode, Dr. Erin Ferguson discusses the rule of law, the principle that everyone, including governments, is equal before the law. Dr. Ferguson examines democratic backsliding in countries like Hungary and the US, where judicial independence and legal norms face growing threats.

We explore the differences between UK parliamentary supremacy and US judicial review, and discuss how disinformation undermines democratic institutions. Dr. Ferguson also highlights Scotland's access to justice crisis, where legal aid cuts mean vulnerable people struggle to find representation.

This episode offers a valuable perspective on why the rule of law matters to everyone and the ongoing work needed to protect this cornerstone of democratic society.

In this episode of The School of Law Podcast from the University of Aberdeen, Dr. Francesca Farrington and Professor Justin Borg-Barthet discuss anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) laws and their crucial role in safeguarding freedom of speech. SLAPPs are lawsuits aimed at silencing critics, such as journalists, activists, and human rights defenders, by burdening them with costly legal battles.

The episode explores how anti-SLAPP laws work to prevent the misuse of defamation claims and other legal threats to stifle public participation in matters of public interest. From high-profile cases involving investigative journalists to broader implications for democracy, the discussion highlights the importance of legal reform to protect individuals and uphold freedom of expression.

This episode provides valuable insights into the legal mechanisms designed to counter abusive lawsuits and emphasises the need for political will and legal frameworks to support democratic dialogue.