What happens when constitutional principles collide with modern convenience? We dive deep into the controversial issue of proxy voting in Congress that recently divided Republican lawmakers. The Constitution never anticipated representatives would claim their job without showing up, yet a recent dispute over allowing proxy voting for personal circumstances threatened to change centuries of precedent.

The stark contrast is unmistakable—we prosecute citizens for voter fraud while considering letting representatives cast multiple votes. As one congressman noted, "proxy voting for regular citizens on Election Day would never be acceptable, so why change the rules for those with even greater responsibility?"

We also explore a fascinating historical parallel: only about 14% of Americans actively participated in the Revolutionary War. This small remnant, guided by biblical principles, managed to defeat the world's strongest military power against overwhelming odds. Could a similar minority influence American culture today? The cultural divide in modern America presents unique challenges compared to the relative consensus of the founding era, particularly on fundamental issues where worldviews have dramatically diverged.

For those struggling to understand our founding documents, we unpack John Locke's challenging Two Treatises of Government—a cornerstone text that profoundly influenced the Declaration of Independence. With sentences sometimes exceeding 200 words written at what would be considered a 78th-grade reading level today, Locke's work requires persistence. Yet understanding his biblical arguments against monarchical divine right reveals how thoroughly Scripture informed America's founding principles.

As we approach the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, reconnecting with these foundational texts and principles becomes increasingly vital for anyone who cherishes constitutional government and liberty.

Support the show

The political and cultural landscape in Washington D.C. has undergone remarkable transformation according to David and Tim Barton, who share their firsthand observations from a recent pastor's briefing in the nation's capital. Their conversations with congressional representatives reveal a refreshing shift in attitude and purpose among newly elected officials who arrive with clear intentions rather than simply occupying office space.

A significant revelation emerged from multiple congressional sources: America has dramatically altered its approach to international relations. Previous administrations had effectively coerced foreign nations into adopting controversial positions on gender, sexuality, and abortion by threatening to withhold financial aid—essentially exporting values that many Americans themselves find troubling. The current administration has halted this practice, no longer using American power to force ideological compliance from countries that often maintain stronger moral positions than our own.

The administration's targeted immigration enforcement strategy showcases another area of meaningful change. Recent deportation efforts have focused specifically on removing violent criminals and gang members from American communities. In just 50 days, immigration authorities have made arrests equivalent to the previous administration's entire final year, with over 14,000 convicted criminals and more than 1,100 gang members among those detained. This strategic prioritization has received judicial support from the Supreme Court, which recently rejected attempts by lower courts to halt deportations.

Equally noteworthy is the administration's approach to international trade. Facing a monthly trade deficit of approximately $130 billion, the president has implemented a straightforward strategy of matching tariffs imposed by other nations. Despite criticism, this approach has already prompted over 50 countries to initiate negotiations, with several immediately dropping all tariffs on American goods—potentially opening markets for U.S. products and creating domestic jobs.

Ready to dive deeper into these issues? Join us for more insights on faith, culture, and the policies shaping America's future. Visit wallbuilders.com to learn how you can participate in upcoming events.

Support the show

Two pressing questions converge in this thought-provoking episode: What role did faith actually play in America's founding, and is there really gold in Fort Knox? David and Tim Barton call in from Washington DC, where they're conducting a pastor's briefing that reveals the forgotten Christian foundations woven throughout our Capitol's history, from the first English Bible printed in America with Congressional approval to church services held in the Capitol building itself.

The conversation takes a fascinating turn when we explore President Trump and Elon Musk's recent statements about verifying the gold reserves at Fort Knox. Financial journalist Andrew Moran joins to explain why this isn't just idle curiosity—if the reported $500 billion in gold reserves aren't actually there, the economic consequences could be catastrophic for every American. Moran traces the controversial history of Fort Knox's gold, much of which came from FDR's confiscation of citizens' private gold holdings in the 1930s, and explains why even Kentucky's own Senator Rand Paul hasn't been allowed to tour the facility.

This episode illuminates how government transparency (or lack thereof) affects both our spiritual and economic foundations. When institutions hide truth and manipulate history—whether about America's Christian heritage or its gold reserves—public trust erodes and conspiracy theories flourish. The solution? Leaders committed to transparency and truth-telling, even when the news isn't what we want to hear. As the team points out, this aligns perfectly with biblical principles of leadership: "able men such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness."

Subscribe now to join us at the intersection of faith, culture, and current events as we work to restore America's constitutional foundations.

Support the show

A quiet revolution in higher education is underway, and Stanley Kurtz has been at the forefront of making it happen. On this episode, we dive deep into Utah's groundbreaking Senate Bill 334 – legislation that requires university students to complete three semesters studying Western civilization and one semester on American civics. But this isn't just another curriculum mandate.

What makes this bill revolutionary is how it ensures implementation. Rather than allowing faculty to subvert legislative intent (as has happened countless times before), these courses will be taught under the supervision of an independent academic unit led by educators who genuinely value traditional education. The bill also mandates full transparency – syllabi, required reading, lecture topics, and discussion themes must all be posted online for public viewing.

Stanley explains why this represents "as big a breakthrough in higher education reform as we've ever seen." We explore how universities have drifted from teaching the origins of ideas to promoting ideologies divorced from their historical consequences. This approach leaves students without the context needed to evaluate contemporary proposals against historical precedent.

David Barton describes this educational reform as "the antidote to wokeness," while Tim Barton highlights how transparency creates accountability that's been missing in academia. We discuss examples of previous educational requirements being undermined by faculty who taught courses like "LGBTQ American History" to fulfill basic civics requirements – something this new approach specifically prevents.

The implications extend far beyond Utah. This legislative model could spread nationwide, potentially transforming how universities approach education. While college isn't necessary for everyone, ensuring quality education for those who attend remains crucial. Whether you're a parent, educator, legislator, or concerned citizen, this conversation will change how you think about higher education reform. Share this episode with someone who cares about the future of education in America.

Support the show

The signs of America's renewal are becoming increasingly apparent as we approach our nation's 250th birthday. From Wisconsin's overwhelming support for election integrity to Arkansas' groundbreaking civics education reforms, citizens across political divides are finding common ground on fundamental principles.

The latest polling reveals a remarkable shift in public sentiment. Even CNN's own data analyst reported that President Trump's approval ratings have reached historic highs—surpassing Obama's numbers for seven of his eight years in office. With 42% of Americans believing the country is moving in the right direction (the highest since George W. Bush's presidency), there's a growing consensus that transcends partisan divisions.

In Arkansas, a visionary "Founding Fathers bill" will soon require students to understand not just what the Founders created, but why they created it. This deeper exploration of phrases like "the Laws of Nature and Nature's God" and concepts such as inalienable rights provides the foundation for a renewed appreciation of America's exceptional system of government.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court appears poised to deliver another victory for religious liberty in a Wisconsin case where tax authorities attempted to define religious organizations so narrowly that even Catholic charities were excluded. This continues the Court's consistent pattern of strengthening First Amendment protections in recent years.

President Trump's executive order addressing crime and homeless encampments in Washington DC demonstrates practical leadership on issues affecting our nation's capital. When even DC's mayor described their meeting as "great," it suggests the possibility for cooperation across political divides on matters of governance and public safety.

As we prepare for America's semiquincentennial celebration, now is the perfect time to deepen your understanding of our founding principles. Join us at WallBuilders as we work to restore appreciation for the constitutional values that have made America the most successful republic in world history.

Support the show

Drawing the line between constitutional authority and overreach is more crucial than ever in today's political landscape. Our deep dive into government's proper role reveals how far we've strayed from the founders' vision of limited federal power - constrained to just a handful of specific responsibilities outlined in the Constitution.

The conversation pivots on a fundamental question: who bears responsibility for caring for the vulnerable in society? When Jesus spoke about caring for "the least of these," He wasn't addressing government institutions but individual believers. This distinction matters profoundly. Biblical teachings clearly separate institutional roles: government administers justice while individuals, families, and churches demonstrate compassion. The blurring of these boundaries hasn't improved outcomes - it's diminished both freedom and genuine charity.

We explore the stark contrast between socialistic and free-market approaches to employment and welfare. History demonstrates without exception that expanded government power correlates directly with diminished personal liberty. Our founders understood this principle, which is why they carefully crafted a system protecting the pursuit - not the guarantee - of happiness.

The discussion extends to practical applications, from the growing movement of states eliminating income taxes to efforts across multiple legislatures to restore the Ten Commandments in public education. These initiatives represent a return to founding principles rather than religious imposition.

Throughout, we emphasize effective communication strategies for discussing these controversial topics. Rather than confrontation, asking thoughtful questions opens doors to meaningful dialogue about our constitutional heritage and biblical foundations. This approach allows us to win people, not just arguments.

Ready to become part of the solution? Visit WallBuilders.com to learn how you can help restore these foundational principles in your community and state.

Support the show

The battle for America's soul is being waged in our museums, national parks, and historical institutions. In this compelling episode, we expose how "woke" historical revisionism is systematically distorting our national narrative, and explore the efforts to reclaim truthful accounts of our past.

We dive deep into troubling examples like the Smithsonian's African American Museum erasing white anti-slavery advocates before the 1820s—effectively eliminating the contributions of founding fathers, Pennsylvania Quakers, and Northern colonies that legislated against slavery decades earlier. From Independence Hall tours that distract from constitutional history to Monticello presentations that vilify Thomas Jefferson, we examine how ideological agendas are reshaping American heritage sites.

Trump's recent executive order mandating a return to factual historical presentations in federally-funded institutions offers a promising path forward. Just as major universities are abandoning DEI programs to maintain federal funding, there's hope our historical institutions might similarly return to accuracy and balance.

Richard Harris joins us to discuss Truth and Liberty's upcoming awards banquet featuring Seth Gruber (creator of the 1916 Project) and honoring courageous individuals like Abby Johnson and Lt. Colonel Theresa Long. This event exemplifies the growing counter-movement dedicated to historical truth and constitutional education.

We wrap with a fascinating discussion of presidential term limits, analyzing Trump's provocative "third term" comments as a masterful example of political trolling that's actually driving Americans back to studying the Constitution. Join us as we explore how reclaiming our historical narrative is essential to preserving our republic's future.

Support the show

Sheryl Crosier never expected to become an advocate for parental rights in medical decision-making. Then she discovered that doctors had placed a Do Not Resuscitate order on her infant son Simon without her knowledge or consent after diagnosing him with trisomy 18. The medical staff had decided his life wasn't worth saving simply because of his chromosomal condition.

This heartbreaking revelation launched Cheryl on a mission to ensure no other parent would be stripped of their right to make critical medical decisions for their children. The result was Simon's Law—groundbreaking legislation requiring healthcare providers to obtain explicit parental permission before placing DNR orders in a minor child's medical chart.

Joined by fellow advocate Sandy Enzminger, whose daughter Tabitha also has trisomy 18 but is thriving at six and a half years old, Cheryl shares the painful details of discovering how medical professionals quietly withheld treatment from her son. "Once he was diagnosed, we started hearing 'not for Simon,'" she explains, revealing how certain lives are deemed less worthy of standard medical interventions.

The implications extend far beyond children with genetic conditions. As Sandy powerfully articulates, any child could find themselves in a situation where doctors might make unilateral end-of-life decisions—whether after a bicycle accident or car crash. The fundamental question becomes: "Do you want a stranger making that life or death decision, or you?"

Currently passed in twelve states with federal legislation pending, Simon's Law represents a critical protection for parental authority in an era where medical "experts" increasingly override family wishes. For those looking to support this vital cause or bring Simon's Law to their state, visit SimonsLaw.org to connect with advocates and learn how to protect the most vulnerable patients and their families from unauthorized end-of-life decisions.

Support the show