The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast

著者: Jack Symes | Andrew Horton Oliver Marley and Rose de Castellane
  • サマリー

  • An 'informal and informative' philosophy podcast inspiring and supporting students, teachers, academics and free-thinkers worldwide. All episodes are available at www.thepanpsycast.com.
    Copyright (©, ®) 2022 - Jack Symes. All Rights Reserved.
    続きを読む 一部表示
activate_samplebutton_t1
エピソード
  • Episode 134, The Philosophy of War (Part II - In Pursuit of Power)
    2024/09/08

    On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, instantly killing up to 80,000 civilians, with another 40,000 dying soon after from burns and radiation poisoning. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led to the surrender of the Japanese Army, marking the end of the most destructive war in history.

    War has been a constant throughout history. Since the dawn of agriculture, humans have waged war against one another. Some argue that war is ingrained in human nature, from our ancestors battling over resources and empires seeking expansion, to biblical genocides and acts of human sacrifice—Homo sapiens are seemingly insatiable for conflict. Others, however, believe war is not inevitable and that we have the capacity for humility, justice, and kindness without resorting to armed conflict.

    We must remember that explaining war is not the same as justifying it. While pacifism, as exemplified by Jesus and Gandhi, is often seen as noble, is non-violence truly effective against regimes intent on ethnic cleansing? If not, how do we determine when war is justified and what defines proportional force? Can the killing of innocent civilians ever be justified? And, if not, how do they differ from innocent combatants? War, huh, good god, what is it good for?

    Links

    A.C. Grayling, War: An Enquiry (book)

    Richard Overy, Why War? (book)

    Jeff Mcmahan, Killing in War (book)

    Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars (book)

    Carl von Clausewitz, On War (book)

    War, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    続きを読む 一部表示
    44 分
  • Episode 134, The Philosophy of War (Part I - The Human Condition)
    2024/08/25

    On August 6, 1945, an atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, instantly killing up to 80,000 civilians, with another 40,000 dying soon after from burns and radiation poisoning. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki led to the surrender of the Japanese Army, marking the end of the most destructive war in history.

    War has been a constant throughout history. Since the dawn of agriculture, humans have waged war against one another. Some argue that war is ingrained in human nature, from our ancestors battling over resources and empires seeking expansion, to biblical genocides and acts of human sacrifice—Homo sapiens are seemingly insatiable for conflict. Others, however, believe war is not inevitable and that we have the capacity for humility, justice, and kindness without resorting to armed conflict.

    We must remember that explaining war is not the same as justifying it. While pacifism, as exemplified by Jesus and Gandhi, is often seen as noble, is non-violence truly effective against regimes intent on ethnic cleansing? If not, how do we determine when war is justified and what defines proportional force? Can the killing of innocent civilians ever be justified? And, if not, how do they differ from innocent combatants? War, huh, good god, what is it good for?

    Links

    A.C. Grayling, War: An Enquiry (book)

    Richard Overy, Why War? (book)

    Jeff Mcmahan, Killing in War (book)

    Michael Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars (book)

    Carl von Clausewitz, On War (book)

    War, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

    続きを読む 一部表示
    43 分
  • Episode 133, 'Vulture Capitalism' with Grace Blakeley: Live at Glastonbury Festival
    2024/08/11

    They say money can’t buy happiness, but it can buy power, freedom, and security. The one per cent – who control nearly half of the world’s wealth – understand this better than anyone. In capitalist democracies, corporations spend billions on political donations and lobbying to influence economic policies in line with their own interests. The trillions spent by governments in propping up the banks following the 2008 financial crash – and the bailing out of the largest corporations through the Covid Corporate Financing Facility – speak volumes: the state and the economy are not separate entities. The goal of the state is clear: “Steady the ship and maintain course.”

    Corporations don’t just pose a threat to our economic freedoms, but the future of the natural world. Just a handful of firms are responsible for over seventy per cent of carbon emissions, and despite public pressure, corporate action on the climate crisis has been largely ineffective. We shouldn’t be surprised; after all, industry holds the power, and turkeys don’t vote for Christmas.

    Links

    Grace Blakeley (website)

    Grace Blakeley (twitter)

    Grace Blakeley, Vulture Capitalism: Corporate Crimes, Backdoor Bailouts and the Death of Freedom

    続きを読む 一部表示
    48 分

あらすじ・解説

An 'informal and informative' philosophy podcast inspiring and supporting students, teachers, academics and free-thinkers worldwide. All episodes are available at www.thepanpsycast.com.
Copyright (©, ®) 2022 - Jack Symes. All Rights Reserved.

The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcastに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。